<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="5.3.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
 <head>
  <doi_batch_id>aspg-30-1358-1792527030</doi_batch_id>
  <timestamp>20261020201030</timestamp>
  <depositor>
   <depositor_name>American Scientific Publishing Group</depositor_name>
   <email_address>admin@americaspg.com</email_address>
  </depositor>
  <registrant>American Scientific Publishing Group</registrant>
 </head>
 <body>
  <journal>
   <journal_metadata language="en">
    <full_title>International Journal of Private Law and International Arbitration</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>IJPLIA</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type="electronic">2836-5216</issn>
   </journal_metadata>
   <journal_issue>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2022</year>
    </publication_date>
    <journal_volume>
     <volume>1</volume>
    </journal_volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
   </journal_issue>
   <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
    <titles>
     <title>Towards a National Strategy for Judicial Accountability: A Critical Review in Jordan</title>
    </titles>
    <contributors>
     <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Inas</given_name>
      <surname>Alkhaldi</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>American University In The Emirates, Dubai, UAE</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
    </contributors>
    <jats:abstract>
     <jats:p>This paper examines the complex relationship between judicial accountability and judicial independence. In order to provide a framework for good governance in the Jordanian judiciary by identifying its main features and shortcomings in its work. The paper describes mechanisms for achieving accountability through various methods of judicial appointment and removal. But more important than these approaches, she says, is the idea of ensuring judicial accountability by insisting that judges are accountable to the law. The experience of the judiciary in Jordan over the past decades has clearly shown that the judicial administration needs a strategic vision based on efficiency, accountability, and integrity. The paper addresses in detail the challenges of judicial administration that need to be addressed through the implementation of a viable national strategy for judicial accountability</jats:p>
    </jats:abstract>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2022</year>
    </publication_date>
    <pages>
     <first_page>25</first_page>
     <last_page>29</last_page>
    </pages>
    <publisher_item>
     <item_number item_number_type="article-number">1358</item_number>
    </publisher_item>
    <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
     <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
    </ai:program>
    <doi_data>
     <doi>10.54216/IJPLIA.010103</doi>
     <resource>https://www.americaspg.com/journal/30/article/1358</resource>
     <collection property="text-mining">
      <item>
       <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://www.americaspg.com/storage/9656.pdf</resource>
      </item>
     </collection>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_article>
  </journal>
 </body>
</doi_batch>
