<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="5.3.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
 <head>
  <doi_batch_id>aspg-3-3452-1791417659</doi_batch_id>
  <timestamp>20261008000059</timestamp>
  <depositor>
   <depositor_name>American Scientific Publishing Group</depositor_name>
   <email_address>admin@americaspg.com</email_address>
  </depositor>
  <registrant>American Scientific Publishing Group</registrant>
 </head>
 <body>
  <journal>
   <journal_metadata language="en">
    <full_title>Fusion: Practice and Applications</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>FPA</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type="print">2770-0070</issn>
    <issn media_type="electronic">2692-4048</issn>
   </journal_metadata>
   <journal_issue>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2025</year>
    </publication_date>
    <journal_volume>
     <volume>18</volume>
    </journal_volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
   </journal_issue>
   <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
    <titles>
     <title>Real-Time Electric Vehicle Battery SOC Estimation Using Advanced Optimization Filtering Techniques</title>
    </titles>
    <contributors>
     <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Hari Prasad</given_name>
      <surname>Bhupathi</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Research Scholar, Dept. of Electronics Engineering, Kalinga University, Raipur, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India and Application Software Supervisor, SWX Department, Stellantis NV, Auburn Hill</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
     <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Srikiran</given_name>
      <surname>Chinta</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Research Scholar, Dept. of Electronics Engineering, Kalinga University, Raipur, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India and Senior Controls Engineer, Hyzon Motors, 3515 Willoway Dr, Troy, Michigan 48</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
     <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Vijayalaxmi</given_name>
      <surname>Biradar</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Prof., Dept. of EE and Director, IQAC, Kalinga University, Raipur, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
     <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Sanjay Kumar</given_name>
      <surname>Suman</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Prof., Dept. of ECE, Dean R&amp;D, St. Martin’s Engineering College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
    </contributors>
    <jats:abstract>
     <jats:p>Improving the Extended Kalman Filter's (EKF) State of Charge (SOC) prediction for EV battery packs is the primary goal of this section. Optimised batteries management procedures rely on SOC estimate that is both accurate and reliable. The EKF is a popular tool for estimating nonlinear states, but how well it works relies heavily on which noise coefficient matrices are used (Q and R). Experimental testing and other conventional approaches of calibrating these matrix systems are extremely costly and time-consuming. In order to tackle this, the section delves into the integration of four state-of-the-art metaheuristic optimisation methods: GA, PSO, SFO, and HHO. By minimising the mean square error (MSE) among the real and expected SOC, these techniques optimise the Q and R matrices. When looking at preciseness, converging speed, and resilience, SFO-EKF comes out on top in both static and dynamic comparisons. By greatly improving the reliability of SOC estimations, the numerical results show that SFO-EKF obtains the lowest MSE &amp; RMSE. This study advances electric car batteries by providing a realistic scheme for combining optimisation methods with EKF to offer highly effective and exact SOC estimates. When as opposed to TR-EKF, GA-EKF, PSO-EKF, and HHO-EKF, the SFO-EKF approach shows the best accuracy, with an improvement of over 94%. This is a result of the suggested model's exceptional efficiency in SOC estimates.</jats:p>
    </jats:abstract>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2025</year>
    </publication_date>
    <pages>
     <first_page>90</first_page>
     <last_page>103</last_page>
    </pages>
    <publisher_item>
     <item_number item_number_type="article-number">3452</item_number>
    </publisher_item>
    <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
     <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
    </ai:program>
    <doi_data>
     <doi>10.54216/FPA.180108</doi>
     <resource>https://www.americaspg.com/journal/3/article/3452</resource>
     <collection property="text-mining">
      <item>
       <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://www.americaspg.com/storage/51735527591.pdf</resource>
      </item>
     </collection>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_article>
  </journal>
 </body>
</doi_batch>
