<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="5.3.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
 <head>
  <doi_batch_id>aspg-21-3969-1791472100</doi_batch_id>
  <timestamp>20261008150820</timestamp>
  <depositor>
   <depositor_name>American Scientific Publishing Group</depositor_name>
   <email_address>admin@americaspg.com</email_address>
  </depositor>
  <registrant>American Scientific Publishing Group</registrant>
 </head>
 <body>
  <journal>
   <journal_metadata language="en">
    <full_title>International Journal of Neutrosophic Science</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>IJNS</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type="print">2692-6148</issn>
    <issn media_type="electronic">2690-6805</issn>
   </journal_metadata>
   <journal_issue>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2026</year>
    </publication_date>
    <journal_volume>
     <volume>27</volume>
    </journal_volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
   </journal_issue>
   <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
    <titles>
     <title>Fuzzy Reliability Estimation for Benktander Distribution</title>
    </titles>
    <contributors>
     <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>Naser</given_name>
      <surname>Odat</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Department of Mathematics, Jadara University, P.O. Box (733), postal code 21111, Irbid, Jordan</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
    </contributors>
    <jats:abstract>
     <jats:p>The fuzzy reliability estimate for the Benktander distribution, a model appropriate for heavy-tailed data, is investigated in this work. By adding membership functions and α-cuts, we extend the Benktander distribution to a fuzzy framework and compute its probability density function and reliability function. The fuzzy reliability is estimated using two methods: maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches. The Bayesian method uses special loss functions, gamma priors, and squared error. The effectiveness of these estimators is examined in a simulated study using varying sample sizes and parameter values. The findings show that, especially for smaller samples, Bayesian techniques—in particular, the cautious Bayes estimator—perform better in terms of accuracy and stability than maximum likelihood estimation. The results emphasize how crucial it is to choose suitable prior distributions and loss functions while doing reliability analysis.</jats:p>
    </jats:abstract>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2026</year>
    </publication_date>
    <pages>
     <first_page>147</first_page>
     <last_page>158</last_page>
    </pages>
    <publisher_item>
     <item_number item_number_type="article-number">3969</item_number>
    </publisher_item>
    <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
     <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
    </ai:program>
    <doi_data>
     <doi>10.54216/IJNS.270115</doi>
     <resource>https://www.americaspg.com/journal/21/article/3969</resource>
     <collection property="text-mining">
      <item>
       <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://www.americaspg.com/storage/81753397868.pdf</resource>
      </item>
     </collection>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_article>
  </journal>
 </body>
</doi_batch>
