<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="5.3.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
 <head>
  <doi_batch_id>aspg-25-4369-1791493348</doi_batch_id>
  <timestamp>20261008210228</timestamp>
  <depositor>
   <depositor_name>American Scientific Publishing Group</depositor_name>
   <email_address>admin@americaspg.com</email_address>
  </depositor>
  <registrant>American Scientific Publishing Group</registrant>
 </head>
 <body>
  <journal>
   <journal_metadata language="en">
    <full_title>Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>JCHCI</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type="print">2771-1471</issn>
    <issn media_type="electronic">2771-1463</issn>
   </journal_metadata>
   <journal_issue>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2026</year>
    </publication_date>
    <journal_volume>
     <volume>11</volume>
    </journal_volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
   </journal_issue>
   <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
    <titles>
     <title>Cross-Modal Memory Support in Visually Demanding Environments: A Controlled Study of Haptic Pulses and Spatial Audio Cues for Reducing Prospective Memory Failures During Multitasking</title>
    </titles>
    <contributors>
     <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>A.</given_name>
      <surname>Nithya</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, India</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
     <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>B.</given_name>
      <surname>Chitra</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Assistant Professor, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Panimalar Engineering College, India</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
     <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      <given_name>V. Sathya</given_name>
      <surname>Preiya</surname>
      <affiliations>
       <institution>
        <institution_name>Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, S.A. Engineering College, Chennai, India</institution_name>
       </institution>
      </affiliations>
     </person_name>
    </contributors>
    <jats:abstract>
     <jats:p>When people are immersed in a visually demanding task, the attentional resources required to monitor the environment for cues that should trigger a remembered intention are frequently captured by the primary task, causing prospective memory failures that range from the inconvenient to the safety-critical. This problem is pervasive in modern work environments in which digital interfaces compete continuously for visual attention, yet the overwhelming majority of reminder and notification systems rely on the same visual channel that is already congested. This paper reports a controlled user study examining whether carefully designed haptic and spatial audio cues can compensate for this visual saturation and restore prospective memory performance without substantially increasing cognitive burden. Thirty-two participants completed a counterbalanced within-subjects protocol in which they performed primary cognitive tasks—document editing on a virtual desktop and navigating in a driving simulation—while managing a set of time-critical intentions delivered through four reminder conditions: visual-only, haptic-only, spatial audio only, and the combined haptic-plus-audio channel. The study measures prospective memory hit rate, task-switching errors, cue response latency, and multidimensional subjective workload across both scenarios and all four conditions. Results consistently favour the combined modality, which produces substantially fewer memory failures and lower reported workload than any single channel, while individual differences in baseline workload predict the magnitude of benefit from non-visual cueing. These findings carry direct implications for the design of ambient notification systems in high-demand professional and safety-critical environments.</jats:p>
    </jats:abstract>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
     <year>2026</year>
    </publication_date>
    <pages>
     <first_page>20</first_page>
     <last_page>28</last_page>
    </pages>
    <publisher_item>
     <item_number item_number_type="article-number">4369</item_number>
    </publisher_item>
    <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
     <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
    </ai:program>
    <doi_data>
     <doi>10.54216/JCHCI.110104</doi>
     <resource>https://www.americaspg.com/journal/25/article/4369</resource>
     <collection property="text-mining">
      <item>
       <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://www.americaspg.com/storage/articles/manuscripts/01M21DFNDRT52YRTCTMP9K9622.pdf</resource>
      </item>
     </collection>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_article>
  </journal>
 </body>
</doi_batch>
