International Journal of Neutrosophic Science IJNS 2690-6805 2692-6148 10.54216/IJNS https://www.americaspg.com/journals/show/1295 2020 2020 Centro de estudios Actividad física terapéutica y deportes de combate, Universidad de Holguín. Holguín, Cuba, Ecuador D. M. Ramírez Guerra Centro de estudios Actividad física terapéutica y deportes de combate, Universidad de Holguín. Holguín, Cuba, Ecuador Y. M. Gordo Gà .. Ingenieria en Sistemas Computacionales, Facultad de Ciencias Matematicas y Físicas Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador L. J. Cevallos Torres Tecnología de la Información, Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador F. G. Palacios Ortiz The goal of this work the critical criteria that affect social sports competition organization's arrangement. Then determine the relations between criteria with others and alternatives. So, the evaluation of the process of social sports competition contains many conflict criteria. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process is an effective tool for dealing with conflict and complex criteria. This work employs a new integrated model for dealing with the problem in an analytical hierarchal process (AHP) and Višekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). SVNSs are the best tool for overcoming uncertainty and incomplete information. The AHP method is used for computing the weights of criteria then VIKOR is used for rank alternatives. The twelve criteria and five alternatives are used in this problem. An illustrative example is provided to present a robust hybrid model. This paper can help organizations and countries for arrangement and organize social sports completion with a scoring system design. 2022 2022 389 402 10.54216/IJNS.190135 https://www.americaspg.com/articleinfo/21/show/1295