176 122
Full Length Article
American Journal of Business and Operations Research
Volume 6 , Issue 1, PP: 72-84 , 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html |PDF

Title

Hybrid multi-criteria decision making model creation for bucket wheel excavator evaluation and selection

Authors Names :   Abedallah Z. Abualkishik   1 *     Rasha Almajed   2     S. Ateeq Almutairi   3  

1  Affiliation :  American University in the Emirates, Dubai, UAE

    Email :  abedallah.abualkishik@aue.ae


2  Affiliation :  American University in the Emirates, Dubai, UAE

    Email :  rasha.almajed@aue.ae


3  Affiliation :  American University in the Emirates, Dubai, UAE ;Computer and Information Science Department, Taibah University, KSA.

    Email :  smoutiri@taibahu.edu.ksa



Doi   :   https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.060106

Received: November 27, 2021 Accepted: January 28, 2022

Abstract :

Residual tensions from manufacturing components and equipment assembly, functional job loads (fixed and dynamic loads), and the disrupted exploitation process all cause strains on bucket-wheel excavators in use (non-stationary dynamic loads). For the purpose of deciding which bucket wheel excavator (BWE) should participate in the rehabilitation and modernisation process, this study proposes a technique for assessing and rating BWEs. In this context, we use a multicriteria approache. The MCDM approach, including the Additive Ratio Assessment, is examined in this work (ARAS). The model, derived from MCDM procedures, are used to the task of assessing the primary metrics that define a BWE's performance. Each cluster of factors, together with their subparameters and potential values, will be subjected to the procedures. There are two sections to the model definitions. Using the ARAS technique, the first section identifies the parameters of most importance and defines their respective priority vectors. In the second section, options are analysed and ranked in accordance with the established criteria using a different set of techniques. The benefits were shown from two perspectives in the paper's findings. The first part is creating a framework that can be used to address other issues with the same structure. There's also the actual machine selection, which is based on a complicated examination of many different variables. In most cases, the model generalises well and may be re-used in future studies with comparable parameters.

Keywords :

ARAS; MCDM; Bucket Wheel Excavator; Experts; Expert; Decision Makers

References :

[1]         K. Haddock, The earthmover encyclopedia. Motorbooks International, 2007.

[2]         S. M. Bošnjak, M. A. Arsić, N. Đ. Zrnić, M. P. Rakin, and M. P. Pantelić, “Bucket wheel excavator: Integrity assessment of the bucket wheel boom tie-rod welded joint,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 212–222, 2011.

[3]         M. Arsić, S. Bošnjak, N. Zrnić, A. Sedmak, and N. Gnjatović, “Bucket wheel failure caused by residual stresses in welded joints,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 700–712, 2011.

[4]         S. M. Bošnjak, M. A. Arsić, N. B. Gnjatović, I. L. J. Milenović, and D. M. Arsić, “Failure of the bucket wheel excavator buckets,” Engineering failure analysis, vol. 84, pp. 247–261, 2018.

[5]         S. Bošnjak, M. Arsić, S. Savićević, G. Milojević, and D. Arsić, “Fracture analysis of the pulley of a bucket wheel boom hoist system,” Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, vol. 18, no. 2, 2016.

[6]         D. Djurdjevic, T. Maneski, V. Milosevic-Mitic, N. Andjelic, and D. Ignjatovic, “Failure investigation and reparation of a crack on the boom of the bucket wheel excavator ERS 1250 Gacko,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 92, pp. 301–316, 2018.

[7]         Ž. Lazarević, I. Aranđelović, and S. Kirin, “AN ANALYSIS OF RANDOM MECHANICAL FAILURES OF BUCKET WHEEL EXCAVATOR ANALIZA SLUČAJNIH MAŠINSKIH OTKAZA ROTORNOG BAGERA,” INTEGRITET I VEK KONSTRUKCIJA, vol. 432, no. 504, p. 468.

[8]         M. A. Arsić, S. M. Bošnjak, Z. D. Odanović, M. M. Dunjić, and A. M. Simonović, “Analysis of the spreader track wheels premature damages,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 20, pp. 118–136, 2012.

[9]         S. M. Bošnjak, D. C. D. Oguamanam, and N. Đ. Zrnić, “The influence of constructive parameters on response of bucket wheel excavator superstructure in the out-of-resonance region,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 977–985, 2015.

[10]       D. Pietrusiak, P. Moczko, T. Smolnicki, and E. Rusiński, “Identification of low cycle dynamic loads acting on heavy machinery,” Procedia engineering, vol. 199, pp. 254–259, 2017.

[11]       I. Cireş and V.-M. Nani, “Stability control for a huge excavator for surface excavation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 388–397, 2016.

[12]       S. BošnjAk, N. B. Gnjatović, and I. Milenović, “From" a priori" to" a posteriori" static stability of the slewing superstructure of a bucket wheel excavator,” Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, vol. 20, no. 2, 2018.

[13]       S. P. Đenadić, P. D. Jovančić, D. M. Ignjatović, F. M. Miletić, and I. V Janković, “Analysis of the application of multi-criteria methods in optimizing the selection of hydraulic excavators on open-cast coal mining,” Tehnika, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 369–377, 2019.

[14]       S. Djenadic, D. Ignjatovic, M. Tanasijevic, U. Bugaric, I. Jankovic, and T. Subaranovic, “Development of the availability concept by using fuzzy theory with AHP correction, a Case study: Bulldozers in the open-pit lignite mine,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 4044, 2019.

[15]       F. Sitorus, J. J. Cilliers, and P. R. Brito-Parada, “Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 121, pp. 393–417, 2019.

[16]       B. Samanta, B. Sarkar, and S. K. Mukherjee, “Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process,” Mining Technology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2002.

[17]       A. Basçetin, “An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine,” Mining Technology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 192–199, 2004.

[18]       O. Acaroglu  Ergin, H. & Eskikaya, S, “Analytical hierarchy process for selection of roadheaders,” Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 569–575, 2006.

[19]       A. A. Bazzazi, M. Osanloo, and H. Soltanmohammadi, “Loading-haulage equipment selection in open pit mines based on fuzzy-TOPSIS method,” Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, vol. 24, no. 4/3, pp. 87–102, 2008.

[20]       D. Komljenovic and V. Kecojevic, “Multi-attribute selection method for materials handling equipment,” International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 151–173, 2009.

[21]       A. Bascetin, “The study of decision making tools for equipment selection in mining engineering operations,” Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, vol. 25, pp. 37–56, 2009.

[22]       A. Lashgari, A. Yazdani–Chamzini, M. M. Fouladgar, E. K. Zavadskas, S. Shafiee, and N. Abbate, “Equipment selection using fuzzy multi criteria decision making model: key study of Gole Gohar iron min,” Engineering economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2012.

[23]       S. Bošnjak, M. Pantelić, N. Zrnić, N. Gnjatović, and M. Đorđević, “Failure analysis and reconstruction design of the slewing platform mantle of the bucket wheel excavator O&K SchRs 630,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 658–669, 2011.

[24]       E. Rusinski, S. Dragan, P. Moczko, and D. Pietrusiak, “Implementation of experimental method of determining modal characteristics of surface mining machinery in the modernization of the excavating unit,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 471–476, 2012.

[25]       J. Varajão and M. M. Cruz-Cunha, “Using AHP and the IPMA Competence Baseline in the project managers selection process,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3342–3354, 2013.

[26]       R. A. Adebimpe, J. M. Akande, and C. Arum, “Mine equipment selection for Ajabanoko iron ore deposit, Kogi State, Nigeria,” Science Research, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 25, 2014.

[27]       A. Yazdani-Chamzini, “An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making model for handling equipment selection,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 660–673, 2014.

[28]       N. Kursunoglu and M. Onder, “Selection of an appropriate fan for an underground coal mine using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 48, pp. 101–109, 2015.

[29]       P. M. Ozfirat, M. K. Ozfirat, T. Malli, and B. Kahraman, “Integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective fuzzy goal programming for selection problems: An application on roadheader selection,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 2015.

[30]       M. Yavuz, “Equipment selection based on the AHP and Yager’s method,” Journal of the southern african institute of mining and metallurgy, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 425–433, 2015.

[31]       E. Rusiński, L. Cegiel, A. Michalczyk, P. Moczko, J. Olejarz, and D. Pietrusiak, “Investigation and modernization of buckets of surface mining machines,” Engineering Structures, vol. 90, pp. 29–37, 2015.

[32]       E. Rusiński, J. Czmochowski, P. Moczko, and D. Pietrusiak, Surface mining machines: problems of maintenance and modernization. Springer, 2017.

[33]       S. Djenadic, M. Tanasijevic, P. Jovancic, D. Ignjatovic, D. Petrovic, and U. Bugaric, “Risk Evaluation: Brief Review and Innovation Model Based on Fuzzy Logic and MCDM,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 811, 2022.

[34]       T. Azdast, R. E. Lee, R. Hasanzadeh, M. Moradian, and S. M. Shishavan, “Investigation of mechanical and morphological properties of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene nanocomposite foams from analytical hierarchy process point of view,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 2579–2599, 2019.

[35]       P. Mojaver, S. Khalilarya, A. Chitsaz, and M. Assadi, “Multi-objective optimization of a power generation system based SOFC using Taguchi/AHP/TOPSIS triple method,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 38, p. 100674, 2020.

[36]       N. Mahdavi, P. Mojaver, and S. Khalilarya, “Multi-objective optimization of power, CO2 emission and exergy efficiency of a novel solar-assisted CCHP system using RSM and TOPSIS coupled method,” Renewable Energy, vol. 185, pp. 506–524, 2022.

[37]       E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making,” Technological and economic development of economy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2010.

[38]       A. Mostafaeipour, S. J. Hosseini Dehshiri, S. S. Hosseini Dehshiri, M. Jahangiri, and K. Techato, “A thorough analysis of potential geothermal project locations in Afghanistan,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8397, 2020.

 


Cite this Article as :
Abedallah Z. Abualkishik , Rasha Almajed , S. Ateeq Almutairi, Hybrid multi-criteria decision making model creation for bucket wheel excavator evaluation and selection, American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Vol. 6 , No. 1 , (2022) : 72-84 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.060106)