1
VIPS-TC, School of Engineering & Technology, New Delhi, India
(vishal.srivastava@vips.edu)
2
Thapar Institute of Engneering & Technology, Patiala, India
(saurabh.bhardwaj@thapar.edu)
3
VIPS-TC, School of Engineering & Technology, New Delhi, India
(gopal@vips.edu)
Abstract :
Traditional and sustainable forms of energy are examined from a variety of angles, including economics, technology, society, ecology, politics, and flexibility, to ensure that Vietnam’s energy industry continues to expand sustainably. These sources have been evaluated and assessed using an extended spherical fuzzy MCDM method. Thermal, gas, nuclear, solar, wind, biomass, and hydro energy alternatives are employed in the decision-making model. The weights of evaluation criteria are determined using the spherical fuzzy AHP model, and renewable power choices are prioritized using the WPM model. We used six main criteria, twenty-six sub-criteria, and seven alternatives. In Vietnam, solar power was found to be the most suitable, followed by wind and hydropower, followed by hydro, followed by Biomass. The worst alternative is thermal. After that, fourteen situations were built, taking into consideration the first five renewable technologies (solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and gas power), in assessing the ideal energy mix scenario for the slow gestation of Vietnam's energy sector. Solar, wind, and hydro energy growth in a pass shipping scenario.
Keywords :
Multi criteria decision making; Compromise solution; Renewable energy; Spherical fuzzy; AHP; WPM; Mining method selection
References :
[1] B. Moldan, S. Janoušková, and T. Hák, “How to understand and measure environmental sustainability:
Indicators and targets,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 17, pp. 4–13, 2012.
[2] B. Atilgan and A. Azapagic, “An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation
in Turkey,” Energy Policy, vol. 93, pp. 168–186, 2016.
[3] R. K. Singh, H. R. Murty, S. K. Gupta, and A. K. Dikshit, “An overview of sustainability assessment
methodologies,” Ecological indicators, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 189–212, 2009.
[4] B. M. Eren, N. Taspinar, and K. K. Gokmenoglu, “The impact of financial development and economic
growth on renewable energy consumption: Empirical analysis of India,” Science of the Total
Environment, vol. 663, pp. 189–197, 2019.
[5] B. Dudley, “BP statistical review of world energy statistical review of world,” bp. com, 2019.
[6] S. K. Saraswat and A. K. Digalwar, “Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of
energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach,”
Renewable Energy, vol. 171, pp. 58–74, 2021.
[7] S. Ghosh, “Electricity supply, employment and real GDP in India: evidence from cointegration and
Granger-causality tests,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 2926–2929, 2009.
[8] L. Tripathi, A. K. Mishra, A. K. Dubey, C. B. Tripathi, and P. Baredar, “Renewable energy: An
overview on its contribution in current energy scenario of India,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, vol. 60, pp. 226–233, 2016.
[9] D. P. Sen Gupta and D. R. Ahuja, “Options for Adjusting Indian Standard Time for Saving Energy
(Final Report Submitted to Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Govt. of India, Ministry of Power)(NIAS
Report No. R3-2011),” 2011.
[10] S. Ali, “The Future of Indian Electricity Demand: How much, by whom, and under what conditions?,”
2018.
[11] A. Evans, V. Strezov, and T. J. Evans, “Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy
technologies,” Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1082–1088, 2009.
[12] L. Stamford and A. Azapagic, “Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power,” Energy,
vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 6037–6057, 2011.
[13] N. Onat and H. Bayar, “The sustainability indicators of power production systems,” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3108–3115, 2010.
[14] B. C. Ervural, S. Zaim, O. F. Demirel, Z. Aydin, and D. Delen, “An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based
SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 82, pp.
1538–1550, 2018.
[15] E. Santoyo-Castelazo and A. Azapagic, “Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating
environmental, economic and social aspects,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 80, pp. 119–138,
2014.
[16] S. J. W. Klein and S. Whalley, “Comparing the sustainability of US electricity options through multicriteria
decision analysis,” Energy Policy, vol. 79, pp. 127–149, 2015.
[17] J. J. C. Barros, M. L. Coira, M. P. De la Cruz López, and A. del Caño Gochi, “Assessing the global
sustainability of different electricity generation systems,” Energy, vol. 89, pp. 473–489, 2015.
[18] R. Srikanth, “India’s sustainable development goals–Glide path for India’s power sector,” Energy Policy,
vol. 123, pp. 325–336, 2018.
[19] K. K. Pandey and H. Rastogi, "Effect of energy consumption & economic growth on environmental
degradation in India: A time series modeling," Energy Procedia, vol. 158, pp. 4232–4237, 2019.
[20] C. Kahraman and İ. Kaya, “A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives,”
Expert systems with applications, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 6270–6281, 2010.
[21] G. Büyüközkan and S. Güleryüz, “Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an
integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations,” Energy, vol. 123, pp.
149–163, 2017.
[22] S. K. Jha and H. Puppala, “Prospects of renewable energy sources in India: Prioritization of alternative
sources in terms of Energy Index,” Energy, vol. 127, pp. 116–127, 2017.
[23] J. J. D. Nesamalar, P. Venkatesh, and S. C. Raja, "The drive of renewable energy in Tamilnadu: Status,
barriers, and future prospect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 73, pp. 115–124, 2017.
[24] S. K. Kar, A. Sharma, and B. Roy, “Solar energy market developments in India,” Renewable and
sustainable energy reviews, vol. 62, pp. 121–133, 2016.
[25] S. K. Sahoo, “Renewable and sustainable energy reviews solar photovoltaic energy progress in India: A
review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 59, pp. 927–939, 2016.
[26] S. Ahmad and R. M. Tahar, “Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of
electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia,” Renewable energy,
vol. 63, pp. 458–466, 2014.
[27] A. Sharma, J. Srivastava, S. K. Kar, and A. Kumar, “Wind energy status in India: A short review,”
Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1157–1164, 2012.
[28] S. K. Saraswat, A. K. Digalwar, S. S. Yadav, and G. Kumar, "MCDM and GIS-based modeling
technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India," Renewable Energy, vol. 169, pp.
865–884, 2021.
[29] A. Jain, P. Das, S. Yamujala, R. Bhakar, and J. Mathur, “Resource potential and variability assessment
of solar and wind energy in India,” Energy, vol. 211, p. 118993, 2020.
[30] S. Sen, S. Ganguly, A. Das, J. Sen, and S. Dey, “Renewable energy scenario in India: Opportunities and
challenges,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, vol. 122, pp. 25–31, 2016.
[31] H.-C. Lee and C.-T. Chang, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy
sources in Taiwan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 883–896, 2018.
[32] F. Kutlu Gündoğdu and C. Kahraman, “Spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its
application to industrial robot selection,” in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems,
2019, pp. 988–996.
[33] A. Görener, B. Ayvaz, A. O. Kuşakcı, and E. Altınok, “A hybrid type-2 fuzzy based supplier
performance evaluation methodology: The Turkish Airlines technic case,” Applied Soft Computing, vol.
56, pp. 436–445, 2017.
[34] F. Kutlu Gündoğdu and C. Kahraman, “Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method,”
Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 337–352, 2019.
[35] M. K. Yilmaz, A. O. Kusakci, M. Aksoy, and U. Hacioglu, “The evaluation of operational efficiencies of
Turkish airports: An integrated spherical fuzzy AHP/DEA approach,” Applied Soft Computing, p.
108620, 2022.
| Style | # |
|---|---|
| MLA | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary. "An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam." Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022 ,PP. 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |
| APA | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary. (2022). An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam. Journal of Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 6 ( 1 ), 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |
| Chicago | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary. "An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam." Journal of Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 6 no. 1 (2022): 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |
| Harvard | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary. (2022). An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam. Journal of Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 6 ( 1 ), 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |
| Vancouver | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary. An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam. Journal of Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, (2022); 6 ( 1 ): 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |
| IEEE | Vishal Srivastava, Saurabh bhardwaj, Gopal Chaudhary, An intelligent multi-criteria decision-based approach for sustainable growth of the energy sector: the case study of India and Vietnam, Journal of Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, Vol. 6 , No. 1 , (2022) : 59-74 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.060105) |