366 348

Title

Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture

  Myvizhi M. 1 *

1  Department of Mathematics, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
    (myvizhi.m@kpriet.ac.in)


Doi   :   https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101

Received: October 11, 2022 Revised: January 01, 2023 Accepted: April 05, 2023

Abstract :

Understanding the efficacy, efficiency, and viability of 5G network design in addressing the needs of the current digital age relies heavily on its assessment. This paper summarizes the assessment of 5G network design, including the evaluation methodology, evaluation techniques, and major conclusions. Infrastructure needs, network capacity, security, interoperability, and cost-effectiveness are just some of the topics it brings up. In order to overcome obstacles and guarantee 5G's effective deployment and performance in real-world settings, the abstract finishes by stressing the need of constant review and improvement of network design. This paper used the single valued neutrosophic set to overcome the uncertain data in evaluation 5G network architecture.  The single valued neutrosophic set integrated with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools to evaluate and select best 5G network architecture. The single valued neutrosophic TOPSIS method used to select best 5G network architecture.

Keywords :

Neutrosophic Set; MCDM; Network; IoT; 5G Network Architecture.

References :

[1]        A. Gupta and R. K. Jha, “A survey of 5G network: Architecture and emerging technologies,” IEEE access, vol. 3, pp. 1206–1232, 2015.

[2]        P. K. Agyapong, M. Iwamura, D. Staehle, W. Kiess, and A. Benjebbour, “Design considerations for a 5G network architecture,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 65–75, 2014.

[3]        D. M. Gutierrez-Estevez et al., “The path towards resource elasticity for 5G network architecture,” in 2018 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW), IEEE, 2018, pp. 214–219.

[4]        A. Sutton, “5G network architecture,” J. Inst. Telecommun. Prof., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2018.

[5]        S. Bergren, “Design Considerations for a 5G Network Architecture,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1705.02902, 2017.

[6]        V. Yazıcı, U. C. Kozat, and M. O. Sunay, “A new control plane for 5G network architecture with a case study on unified handoff, mobility, and routing management,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 76–85, 2014.

[7]        S. Ahmadi, “5G network architecture,” 5G NR, pp. 1–194, 2019.

[8]        N. Al-Falahy and O. Y. K. Alani, “Millimetre wave frequency band as a candidate spectrum for 5G network architecture: A survey,” Phys. Commun., vol. 32, pp. 120–144, 2019.

[9]        S. I. A. Aal, “Neutrosophic Framework for Assessment Challenges in Smart Sustainable Cities based on IoT to Better Manage Energy Resources and Decrease the Urban Environment’s Ecological Impact,” Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, vol. 6, pp. 9–16, 2023.

[10]      N. Y. Pehlivan and N. Yalçın, “Neutrosophic TOPSIS method for sustainable supplier selection in a discount market chain,” in Handbook of Research on Advances and Applications of Fuzzy Sets and Logic, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 692–715.

[11]      R. Atassi and K. Yang, “An Integrated Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Methods for Assessment Renewable Energy Barriers for Sustainable Developmen.,” Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci., vol. 18, no. 2, 2022.

[12]      N. Chopra, R. Sindwani, and M. Goel, “Prioritising teaching modalities by extending TOPSIS to single-valued neutrosophic environment,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., pp. 1–12, 2022.

[13]      M. Mollaoglu, U. Bucak, H. Demirel, and A. Balin, “Evaluation of various fuel alternatives in terms of sustainability for the ship investment decision using single valued neutrosophic numbers with TOPSIS methods,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ., vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 215–226, 2023.

[14]      Shereen Zaki,Mahmoud M. Ibrahim,Mahmoud M. Ismail, Interval Valued Neutrosophic VIKOR Method for Assessment Green Suppliers in Supply Chain, International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 2 , No. 1 , (2022) : 15-22 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.020102)

[15]      M. F. O. Noboa, O. E. P. Copa, and E. ANG, “Comparative analysis of multicriteria methods based on single-valued neutrosophic numbers for the evaluation of medical technologies.,” Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci., vol. 18, no. 4, 2022.

[16]      Y. Li, Q. Cai, and G. Wei, “PT-TOPSIS methods for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic sets,” Int. J. Knowledge-based Intell. Eng. Syst., no. Preprint, pp. 1–18.

[17]      Q. C. Li, H. Niu, A. T. Papathanassiou, and G. Wu, “5G network capacity: Key elements and technologies,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2014.

[18]      M. Khaturia, P. Jha, and A. Karandikar, “Connecting the unconnected: Toward frugal 5G network architecture and standardization,” IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–71, 2020.

[19]      G. Colajanni and D. Sciacca, “An Optimization model for service requests management in a 5G network architecture,” in Optimization and Data Science: Trends and Applications: 5th AIROYoung Workshop and AIRO PhD School 2021 Joint Event, Springer, 2021, pp. 81–98.

[20]      A. Paramonov et al., “Beyond 5g network architecture study: fractal properties of access network,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 20, p. 7191, 2020.

[21]      A. Alnoman and A. Anpalagan, “Towards the fulfillment of 5G network requirements: technologies and challenges,” Telecommun. Syst., vol. 65, pp. 101–116, 2017.

[22]      P. S. Khodashenas et al., “5G network challenges and realization insights,” in 2016 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–4.

[23]      I. F. Akyildiz, P. Wang, and S.-C. Lin, “SoftAir: A software defined networking architecture for 5G wireless systems,” Comput. Networks, vol. 85, pp. 1–18, 2015.

[24]      B. G. Evans, “The role of satellites in 5G,” in 2014 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC), IEEE, 2014, pp. 197–202.

[25]      M. Hosseinian, J. P. Choi, S.-H. Chang, and J. Lee, “Review of 5G NTN standards development and technical challenges for satellite integration with the 5G network,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 22–31, 2021.

[26]      A. Ahad, M. Tahir, and K.-L. A. Yau, “5G-based smart healthcare network: architecture, taxonomy, challenges and future research directions,” IEEE access, vol. 7, pp. 100747–100762, 2019.

[27]      N. Al-Falahy and O. Y. Alani, “Technologies for 5G networks: Challenges and opportunities,” It Prof., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2017.

[28]      A. Hakiri and P. Berthou, “Leveraging sdn for the 5g networks: Trends, prospects, and challenges,” Softw. Defin. Mob. Networks Beyond LTE Netw. Archit., pp. 61–80, 2015.

[29]      A. Sutton, “5G network architecture, design and optimisation,” in IET 5G Conference. Online verfügbar unter: https://www. slideshare. net/3G4GLtd/5g-network-architecture-design-and-optimisation letzter Zugriff am, 2018, p. 2018.

[30]      P. William, S. Choubey, M. Ramkumar, A. Verma, K. Vengatesan, and A. Choubey, “Implementation of 5G network architecture with interoperability in heterogeneous wireless environment using radio spectrum,” in 2022 International conference on electronics and renewable systems (ICEARS), IEEE, 2022, pp. 786–791.

[31]      D. Jeni Seles Martina and G. Deepa, “Operations on Multi-Valued Neutrosophic Matrices and Its Application to Neutrosophic Simplified-TOPSIS Method,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 22, no. 01, pp. 37–56, 2023.

[32]      H. Wang, Y. Luo, B. Deng, J. Lin, and X. Li, “Doctor selection based on aspect-based sentiment analysis and neutrosophic TOPSIS method,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 124, p. 106599, 2023.


Cite this Article as :
Style #
MLA Myvizhi M.. "Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture." International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2023 ,PP. 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)
APA Myvizhi M.. (2023). Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 ( 1 ), 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)
Chicago Myvizhi M.. "Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture." Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 no. 1 (2023): 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)
Harvard Myvizhi M.. (2023). Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 ( 1 ), 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)
Vancouver Myvizhi M.. Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, (2023); 4 ( 1 ): 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)
IEEE Myvizhi M., Neutrosophic MCDM Model for Evaluation and Selection best 5G Network Architecture, Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4 , No. 1 , (2023) : 08-18 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040101)