1
Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Sharqiyah, Egypt
(tamer.hasan.comp@o6u.edu.eg)
Abstract :
Considering renewable energy sources in assessments of sustainable electricity production is essential for accelerating the shift to a greener and more sustainable energy system. The evaluation takes into account a wide range of factors, such as the renewable energy source, carbon footprint, energy efficiency, environmental impact, grid integration, policy support, cost, social and economic implications, technological progress, and certification for transparency. Sustainable power deployment may be hastened via careful consideration of these aspects by policymakers, energy planners, and other stakeholders. This paper shows the hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method with the single-valued neutrosophic set. The single valued neutrosophic set was used to overcome the vague information. The single valued neutrosophic set hybrid with the Characteristic Object METhod (COMET) method. The COMET method is an MCDM method. It is used to rank the alternatives. This paper used ten criteria and ten alternatives. The application is conducted to show the results of the proposed method.
Keywords :
Renewable Energy; Sustainability; Electricity; MCDM; COMET; Neutrosophic Set
References :
[1] B. Truffer, C. Bratrich, J. Markard, A. Peter, A. Wüest, and B. Wehrli, “Green Hydropower: The contribution of aquatic science research to the promotion of sustainable electricity,” Aquat. Sci., vol. 65, pp. 99–110, 2003.
[2] M. Ilic, L. Xie, and Q. Liu, Engineering IT-enabled sustainable electricity services: the tale of two low-cost green Azores Islands, vol. 30. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[3] K. Nguyen and B. D. Bruce, “Growing green electricity: progress and strategies for use of photosystem I for sustainable photovoltaic energy conversion,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, vol. 1837, no. 9, pp. 1553–1566, 2014.
[4] J. B. Valaki and P. P. Rathod, “Investigating feasibility through performance analysis of green dielectrics for sustainable electric discharge machining,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 541–549, 2016.
[5] R. Ozaki, “Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity?,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2011.
[6] A. Hast, S. Syri, J. Jokiniemi, M. Huuskonen, and S. Cross, “Review of green electricity products in the United Kingdom, Germany and Finland,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 42, pp. 1370–1384, 2015.
[7] Abedallah Z. Abualkishik,Rasha Almajed, Triangular Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making AHP Method for Solar Power Site Selection, International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 2 , No. 2 , (2022) : 08-15 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.020201)
[8] S. Faizi, W. Sałabun, T. Rashid, J. Wątróbski, and S. Zafar, “Group decision-making for hesitant fuzzy sets based on characteristic objects method,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 8, p. 136, 2017.
[9] M. Wu, R. Chen, and J. Fan, “Application of evidence reasoning algorithm and QUALIFLEX with single-valued neutrosophic set for MCDM,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., no. Preprint, pp. 1–16, 2022.
[10] C. Tian, J. J. Peng, Z. Q. Zhang, M. Goh, and J. Q. Wang, “A multi-criteria decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic partitioned Heronian mean operator,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 1189, 2020.
[11] S. Broumi et al., “Interval valued pentapartitioned neutrosophic graphs with an application to MCDM,” Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 68–91, 2022.
[12] Ş. Özlü and F. Karaaslan, “Hybrid similarity measures of single-valued neutrosophic type-2 fuzzy sets and their application to MCDM based on TOPSIS,” Soft Comput., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 4059–4080, 2022.
[13] S. Dey and G. C. Ray, “Properties of Redefined Neutrosophic Composite Relation,” Neutrosophic Syst. with Appl., vol. 7, pp. 1–12, 2023.
[14] J. Ye, S. Du, and R. Yong, “Multi-criteria decision-making model using trigonometric aggregation operators of single-valued neutrosophic credibility numbers,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., p. 118968, 2023.
[15] T. R. Ayodele, A. S. O. Ogunjuyigbe, O. D. Ajayi, A. A. Yusuff, and T. C. Mosetlhe, “Willingness to pay for green electricity derived from renewable energy sources in Nigeria,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 148, p. 111279, 2021.
[16] K. Arkesteijn and L. Oerlemans, “The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes,” Energy Policy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2005.
[17] D. P. Strik, H. V. M. Hamelers, J. F. H. Snel, and C. J. N. Buisman, “Green electricity production with living plants and bacteria in a fuel cell,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 870–876, 2008.
[18] Y. Huang et al., “Graphene oxide assemblies for sustainable clean-water harvesting and green-electricity generation,” Accounts Mater. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2021.
[19] S.-H. Yoo and S.-Y. Kwak, “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 5408–5416, 2009.
[20] L. Gan, G. S. Eskeland, and H. H. Kolshus, “Green electricity market development: Lessons from Europe and the US,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 2007.
[21] O. Parniakov, F. J. Barba, N. Grimi, N. Lebovka, and E. Vorobiev, “Extraction assisted by pulsed electric energy as a potential tool for green and sustainable recovery of nutritionally valuable compounds from mango peels,” Food Chem., vol. 192, pp. 842–848, 2016.
[22] K. Yoo et al., “Optimized renewable and sustainable electricity generation systems for Ulleungdo Island in South Korea,” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 7883–7893, 2014.
[23] S. Salmela and V. Varho, “Consumers in the green electricity market in Finland,” Energy Policy, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 3669–3683, 2006.
[24] A. Munshi and W. Sampath, “CdTe photovoltaics for sustainable electricity generation,” J. Electron. Mater., vol. 45, pp. 4612–4619, 2016.
[25] B. Ridhosari and A. Rahman, “Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 246, p. 119172, 2020.
[26] W. M. Lafferty, Promoting sustainable electricity in Europe: challenging the path dependence of dominant energy systems. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
[27] I. H. Rowlands, D. Scott, and P. Parker, “Consumers and green electricity: profiling potential purchasers,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 36–48, 2003.
[28] F. Mattern, T. Staake, and M. Weiss, “ICT for green: how computers can help us to conserve energy,” in Proceedings of the 1st international conference on energy-efficient computing and networking, 2010, pp. 1–10.
[29] A. Piegat and W. Sałabun, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease,” in Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: 14th International Conference, ICAISC 2015, Zakopane, Poland, June 14-18, 2015, Proceedings, Part I 14, Springer, 2015, pp. 228–238.
[30] M. Ali, Z. Hussain, and M.-S. Yang, “Hausdorff distance and similarity measures for single-valued neutrosophic sets with application in multi-criteria decision making,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 201, 2022.
[31] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, F. Smarandache, and N. ul Amin, “Logarithmic hybrid aggregation operators based on single valued neutrosophic sets and their applications in decision support systems,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 364, 2019.
| Style | # |
|---|---|
| MLA | Tamer H. M. Soliman. "Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources." International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2023 ,PP. 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |
| APA | Tamer H. M. Soliman. (2023). Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 ( 1 ), 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |
| Chicago | Tamer H. M. Soliman. "Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources." Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 no. 1 (2023): 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |
| Harvard | Tamer H. M. Soliman. (2023). Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, 4 ( 1 ), 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |
| Vancouver | Tamer H. M. Soliman. Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources. Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, (2023); 4 ( 1 ): 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |
| IEEE | Tamer H. M. Soliman, Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making COMET Method for Evaluation Sustainable Electricity Generation Considering Renewable Energy Sources, Journal of International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4 , No. 1 , (2023) : 19-27 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.040102) |