Volume 11 • Issue 2 • PP: 10–15 • 2026
Computer Resource Usability Modelling from Virtual-Machine Workload Traces: A Cognitive HCI Perspective
Open Access & Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
View PDF Abstract
Computer usability is often discussed through screen layout, navigation, and task flow, although the experience of using a computer also depends on whether processor, memory, storage, and network resources remain available when the user needs them. This paper develops a Computer Resource Usability Index (CRUI) for interpreting virtual-machine resource traces as indicators of user-facing usability risk. The proposed index converts CPU, memory, disk, and network measurements into a bounded resource-friction score and then maps this score into four actionable usability states: comfortable, watch, constrained, and strained. The analysis uses a processed extract following the public GWA-T-12 Bitbrains trace structure, which records VM-level resource metrics for enterprise applications. The results show that resource usability is not explained by CPU usage alone; imbalance across resource channels, I/O pressure, and variability also contribute to predicted friction. The findings provide a practical bridge between infrastructure monitoring and cognitive HCI by translating low-level resource traces into interface-relevant decisions such as when to defer background tasks, warn the user, or allocate additional headroom.
Keywords
References
[1] R. Hamdani and I. Chihi, “Adaptive human-computer interaction for Industry 5.0: A novel concept, with comprehensive review and empirical validation,” Computers in Industry, vol. 168, article 104268, 2025.
[2] T. Kosch, J. Karolus, J. Zagermann, H. Reiterer, A. Schmidt, and P. W. Wo´zniak, “A survey on measuring cognitive workload in human-computer interaction,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 13s, article 283, pp. 1–39, 2023.
[3] G. Liu, W. Lin, H. Zhang, S. Peng, P. Nawrocki, and A. Iosup, “Public datasets for cloud computing: A comprehensive survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 8, article 198, pp. 1–38, 2025.
[4] S. Shen, V. van Beek, and A. Iosup, “Characterizing workloads from Bitbrains cloud datacenters,” Delft University of Technology, Parallel and Distributed Systems Report Series PDS-2015-003, 2015.
[5] P. K. Kollu, D. C. V. R. B. Krishna, and R. B. V. Subramanyam, “Comparative analysis of cloud resources forecasting using machine learning techniques,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 35, no. 4, article e4933, 2024.
[6] H. L. Leka, P. G. Sharma, and M. B. Naragund, “PSObased ensemble meta-learning approach for cloud resource usage prediction,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 3, article 613, 2023.
[7] N. M. Dang-Quang, N. N. T. Huynh, and N. H. Tran, “An efficient multivariate autoscaling framework using Bi-LSTM for cloud applications,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, article 3523, 2022.
[8] B. Predi´c, L. Jovanovi´c, V. Simi´c, M. Štrbac, and D. Štrbac, “Cloud-load forecasting via decomposition-aided attention recurrent neural network tuned by modified particle swarm optimization,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, pp. 2249–2269, 2024.
[9] I. Silveira, R. Varandas, and H. Gamboa, “Cognitive Lab: A dataset of biosignals and HCI features for cognitive process investigation,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 269, article 108863, 2025.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.