Volume 6 • Issue 1 • PP: 25 –30 • 2026
Price-Aware and Explainable Analytics for Urban Electric Vehicle Charging Networks: Forecasting Utilization Regimes for Sustainable Charging Operations
Open Access & Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Abstract
The efficient functioning of the electric-vehicle charging systems that are publicly operated has become focused on reliable short-horizon forecasting. The paper establishes an explainable and price-conscious analytical model to predict short-term charging usage and demonstrate the utility of tariff signals in an urban charging system. The analysis is based on UrbanEV benchmark, a new six months hourly panel of Shenzhen public charging infrastructure, which integrates occupancy, charging time, charging volume, electricity tariffs, service charges, weather and spatial descriptors. The concept of charging occupancy is considered an operation state variable with connection to queue exposure, reliability of service, and tactical intervention. A succinct mathematical formulation is created to use it in one-step-ahead utilization forecasting and in interpreting low-, medium-, and high-utilization regime. The empirical analysis is pegged to benchmark evidence reported to UrbanEV, where transformer-based forecasting had the best node-level performance and TimeXer had the best RMSE values of 0.07 in occupancy, 2.73 in charging duration, and 43.66 in charging volume. Further discussion indicates that occupancy prediction is accurate enough to justify regime based intervention and strongest additional gains are obtained through the joint effect of pricing variables and temperature-price interactions as opposed to single covariates. The results justify the justifiable, price-conscious forecasting as an operational decision tool to alleviate congestion, design tariffs and specific capacity planning in sustainable charging networks.
Keywords
References
[1] M. Tran, D. Banister, J. D. K. Bishop, and M. D. McCulloch, “Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 328–333, 2012.
[2] G. Crabtree, “The coming electric vehicle transformation,” Science, vol. 366, no. 6464, pp. 422–424, 2019.
[3] International Energy Agency, Global EV Outlook 2024. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2024.
[4] M. Muratori, “Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand,” Nature Energy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 193–201, 2018.
[5] Z. J. Lee, T. Li, and S. H. Low, “ACN-Data: Analysis and applications of an open EV charging dataset,” in Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, pp. 139–149, 2019.
[6] A. Aveklouris, M. Vlasiou, and B. Zwart, “A stochastic resource-sharing network for electric vehicle charging,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1050–1061, 2019.
[7] X. Zhang et al., “Deep-learning-based probabilistic forecasting of electric vehicle charging load with a novel queuing model,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 3157– 3170, 2020.
[8] O. I. Asensio, M. C. Lawson, and C. Z. Apablaza, “Electric vehicle charging stations in the workplace with high-resolution data from casual and habitual users,” Scientific Data, vol. 8, p. 168, 2021.
[9] Z. Zhao and C. K. M. Lee, “Dynamic pricing for EV charging stations: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2456–2468, 2021.
[10] T. Ma and S. Faye, “Multistep electric vehicle charging station occupancy prediction using mixed LSTM neural networks,” Energy, vol. 244, p. 123217, 2022.
[11] Z. Yi, X. C. Liu, R. Wei, X. Chen, and J. Dai, “Electric vehicle charging demand forecasting using deep learning model,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 690–703, 2022.
[12] S. Wang et al., “Short-term electric vehicle charging demand prediction: A deep learning approach,” Applied Energy, vol. 340, p. 121032, 2023.
[13] S. Wang, A. Chen, P. Wang, and C. Zhuge, “Predicting electric vehicle charging demand using a heterogeneous spatiotemporal graph convolutional network,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 153, p. 104205, 2023.
[14] A. Orzechowski et al., “A data-driven framework for mediumterm electric vehicle charging demand forecasting,” Energy and AI, vol. 14, p. 100267, 2023.
[15] H. Qu, H. Kuang, Q. Wang, J. Li, and L. You, “A physicsinformed and attention-based graph learning approach for regional electric vehicle charging demand prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 14284–14297, 2024.
[16] H. Kuang, X. Zhang, H. Qu, L. You, R. Zhu, and J. Li, “Unraveling the effect of electricity price on electric vehicle charging behavior: A case study in Shenzhen, China,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 115, p. 105836, 2024.
[17] H. Qu et al., “ChatEV: Predicting electric vehicle charging demand as natural language processing,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 136, p. 104470, 2024.
[18] K. Baek, E. Lee, and J. Kim, “A dataset for multi-faceted analysis of electric vehicle charging transactions,” Scientific Data, vol. 11, p. 262, 2024.
[19] Y. Amara-Ouali et al., “Forecasting electric vehicle charging station occupancy: Smarter Mobility Data Challenge,” Journal of Data-Centric Machine Learning Research, vol. 16, pp. 1–27, 2024.
[20] H. Kuang, H. Qu, K. Deng, and J. Li, “A physics-informed graph learning approach for citywide electric vehicle charging demand prediction and pricing,” Applied Energy, vol. 363, p. 123059, 2024.
[21] B. Palaniyappan et al., “Dynamic pricing for load shifting: Reducing electric vehicle charging demand peaks using an optimization-based pricing mechanism,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 104, p. 105285, 2024.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.