Volume 5 • Issue 1 • PP: 01–07 • 2027
Trade Barriers Within a Customs Union: Export Vulnerability and Market Adjustment in Armenia
Open Access & Copyright
© 2027 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
View PDF Abstract
This paper examines Armenia’s reliance on the EAEU market and the impact of Russia’s 2026 trade restrictions on Armenian export patterns. It covers the full range of Armenian merchandise exports from 2015 to 2025 and looks at a number of specific developments in agricultural trade in 2026. The analysis is based on a range of statistical and comparative techniques to assess the geographical structure of exports, levels of market concentration and shifts in the pattern of destinations. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index is used as a measure of the level of concentration of exports within the EAEU. The results show that Russia continues to be Armenia’s dominant trading partner in the EAEU, taking up around 92% of Armenia’s total exports to EAEU countries in 2025. The degree of dependence is particularly pronounced in the case of vegetables, fish and fruit with Russian market shares of 98%, 97% and 93% respectively. The trade restrictions introduced in 2026 were accompanied by a fall in agricultural exports and a change in the geographical pattern of those exports. Some exporters have shifted their products to Georgia, Uzbekistan and other countries. The data available do not allow us to determine whether these other markets have made up for the loss of exports to Russia. The findings confirm that export concentration remains a significant source of vulnerability for Armenian producers and that a greater degree of market diversification would be beneficial to the stability of Armenian foreign trade.
Keywords
References
[1] S. Bekbolotova, N. Djanibekov, and T. Herzfeld, “How does regional economic integration impact trade in small economies? evidence from Armenia and Kyr-gyzstan’s EAEU accession,” Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 829–857, 2025.
[2] R. Vakulchuk and A. Knobel, “Impact of non-tariff barriers on trade within the eurasian economic union,” Post-Communist Economies, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–481, 2018.
[3] A. Cerqua, P. Montalbano, and Z. Temerbulatova, “A decade of eurasian integration: An ex-post non-parametric assessment of the eurasian economic union,” International Economics, vol. 178, 2024.
[4] ARKA News Agency, “Control over quarantine phy-tosanitary goods in armenia and russia to be enhanced,” August 27 2025.
[5] M. Chupilkin, B. Javorcik, A. Peeva, and A. Plekhanov, “Economic sanctions and intermediated trade,” AEA Pa-pers and Proceedings, vol. 115, pp. 568–572, 2025.
[6] World Bank Group, “Armenia monthly economic up-date – january 2025,” Macroeconomics, Trade and In-vestment, Tech. Rep., Jan. 2025.
[7] D. G. Tarr, “The eurasian economic union of russia, belarus, kazakhstan, armenia, and the kyrgyz republic: Can it succeed where its predecessor failed?” Eastern European Economics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2016.
[8] E. Vinokurov, “Eurasian economic union: Current state and preliminary results,” Russian Journal of Economics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–70, 2017.
[9] A. Cie´slik and O. Gurshev, “Friends with or without benefits? an empirical evaluation of bilateral trade and economic integration between some of the post-soviet economies,” Eurasian Economic Review, vol. 12, pp. 769–795, 2022.
[10] A. Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan and J. Hugot, “Gravity-based tools to assess the impact of tariff changes: An applica-tion to armenia,” Asian Development Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 219–256, 2024.
[11] H. Mardanyan and K. Khachatryan, “Armenia’s depen-dence on foreign countries and sources in key economic and financial sectors,” Bulletin of Yerevan University G: Economics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 5–18, 2025.
[12] G. Khmeleva, M. Kurnikova, and E. Chirkunova, “The reconfiguration of intra-regional trade in the EAEU un-der sanctions against russia,” Bulletin of Yerevan Uni-versity G: Economics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 31–44, 2025.
[13] V. A. Ferguson, S. Waldron, and D. J. Lim, “Market adjustments to import sanctions: Lessons from chinese restrictions on australian trade, 2020–21,” Review of In-ternational Political Economy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1255–1281, 2023.
[14] S. Ahn and S. Steinbach, “The impact of COVID-19 trade measures on agricultural and food trade,” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 911–927, 2023.
[15] M. Larch, J. Luckstead, and Y. V. Yotov, “Economic sanctions and agricultural trade,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1477–1517, 2024.
[16] A. Grigoryan, “Russia, uae and china named top arme-nian export destinations,” Armenpress Armenian News Agency, August 15 2025.
[17] A. Kochinyan and R. Ghevondyan, “Main dependencies of the republic of armenia on the russian federation: Threats and solutions,” Research Center on Security Policy and Union of Informed Citizens, Tech. Rep., May 2025.
[18] European External Action Service, “European union and armenia adopt new strategic agenda to deepen part-nership,” Delegation of the European Union to Armenia, December 2 2025.
[19] Economic Development and Research Center, “Balance of payments and foreign trade: Armenia,” n.d.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.