ASPG Menu
search

American Scientific Publishing Group

verified Journal

American Journal of Business and Operations Research

ISSN
Online: 2692-2967 Print: 2770-0216
Frequency

Continuous publication

Publication Model

Open access · Articles freely available online · $500 APC applies after acceptance

American Journal of Business and Operations Research
Full Length Article

Volume 14 • Issue 2 • PP: 43–51 • 2026

Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan

Azizjon Kholmatov *
1 Independent researcher at Tashkent International University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
* Corresponding Author.
verified

Open Access & Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: January 03, 2026 Revised: March 01, 2026 Accepted: April 15, 2026

Abstract

This study identifies strategic priorities for ensuring the liquidity of commercial banks in Uzbekistan through a business data analytics framework that combines regulatory liquidity indicators with a structural analysis of bank funding. Using aggregate data published by the Central Bank of Uzbekistan and the International Monetary Fund for 2020–2025, the paper develops a descriptive, diagnostic, and scenario-based analytics pipeline comprising ratio analysis, a logarithmic decomposition of the loan-to-deposit ratio, a currency-specific funding-gap measure, a deposit run-off sensitivity test, and constant-growth scenarios. The results show that short-term buffers are ample: at the end of 2025 the liquidity coverage ratio stood at 207.5 percent, the net stable funding ratio at 119.9 percent, and high-quality liquid assets at 21 percent of total assets, enough to cover 1.96 times the outflows of a severe run-off scenario. The structural position is weaker. Loans still exceed deposits by 186.7 trillion soums, about 80 percent of this gap is denominated in foreign currency, and the gap is concentrated in state-owned banks. Scenario arithmetic indicates that the loan-to-deposit ratio declines only marginally unless deposit growth exceeds credit growth by a sustained margin. Seven priorities follow, ranging from stable deposit mobilisation and currency-matched funding to the risk-sensitive calibration of liquidity requirements, market and safety-net infrastructure, and bank-level liquidity analytics. The study shows how business intelligence built on publicly reported data can support evidence-based liquidity decisions by bank managers and supervisors.

Keywords

Business intelligence Business data analytics Bank liquidity Liquidity coverage ratio Net stable funding ratio Loan-to-deposit ratio Funding structure Dollarization Uzbekistan

References

[1] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision,” Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Sep. 2008.

[2] D. W. Diamond and P. H. Dybvig, “Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 401–419, 1983.

[3] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Report on the 2023 banking turmoil,” Bank for International Set-tlements, Basel, Oct. 2023.

[4] E. X. Jiang, G. Matvos, T. Piskorski, and A. Seru, “Mon-etary tightening and U.S. bank fragility in 2023: Mark-to-market losses and uninsured depositor runs?” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 159, p. 103899, 2024.

[5] President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On the strat-egy for reforming the banking system of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2020–2025,” Decree No. UP-5992, Tashkent, May 12, 2020.

[6] Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Financial Stability Report for 2025,” Tashkent, Jul. 2026.

[7] International Monetary Fund, “Republic of Uzbekistan: Financial Sector Assessment Program—Financial sys-tem stability assessment,” IMF Country Report No. 25/145, Washington, DC, Jun. 2025.

[8] Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Roadmap aimed at further improving the bank regulation and su-pervision system in 2025–2028,” Tashkent, Nov. 2025.

[9] D. W. Diamond and R. G. Rajan, “Liquidity risk, liquid-ity creation, and financial fragility: A theory of bank-ing,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 287–327, 2001.

[10] A. K. Kashyap, R. Rajan, and J. C. Stein, “Banks as liquidity providers: An explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit-taking,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 33–73, 2002.

[11] B. Holmström and J. Tirole, “Private and public supply of liquidity,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 1998.

[12] M. K. Brunnermeier and L. H. Pedersen, “Market liq-uidity and funding liquidity,” The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2201–2238, 2009.

[13] F. Allen and D. Gale, “Financial contagion,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2000.

[14] J. Tirole, “Illiquidity and all its friends,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 287–325, 2011.

[15] M. Drehmann and K. Nikolaou, “Funding liquidity risk: Definition and measurement,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 2173–2182, 2013.

[16] A. N. Berger and C. H. S. Bouwman, “Bank liquidity creation,” The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 3779–3837, 2009.

[17] M. M. Cornett, J. J. McNutt, P. E. Strahan, and H. Tehra-nian, “Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 297–312, 2011.

[18] F. Vazquez and P. Federico, “Bank funding structures and risk: Evidence from the global financial crisis,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 61, pp. 1–14, 2015.

[19] V. Acharya and H. Naqvi, “The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk taking over the business cycle,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 349–366, 2012.

[20] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitor-ing tools,” Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Jan. 2013.

[21] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Basel III: The net stable funding ratio,” Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Oct. 2014.

[22] C. Bonner, I. van Lelyveld, and R. Zymek, “Banks’ liquidity buffers and the role of liquidity regulation,” Journal of Financial Services Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 215–234, 2015.

[23] R. N. Banerjee and H. Mio, “The impact of liquidity reg-ulation on banks,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 35, pp. 30–44, 2018.

[24] R. DeYoung and K. Y. Jang, “Do banks actively manage their liquidity?” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 66, pp. 143–161, 2016.

[25] H. Hong, J.-Z. Huang, and D. Wu, “The information content of Basel III liquidity risk measures,” Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 15, pp. 91–111, 2014.

[26] M. R. King, “The Basel III net stable funding ratio and bank net interest margins,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 4144–4156, 2013.

[27] I. Distinguin, C. Roulet, and A. Tarazi, “Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 3295–3317, 2013.

[28] M. Bech and T. Keister, “Liquidity regulation and the implementation of monetary policy,” Journal of Mone-tary Economics, vol. 92, pp. 64–77, 2017.

[29] I. Drechsler, A. Savov, and P. Schnabl, “The deposits channel of monetary policy,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 1819–1876, 2017.

[30] G. De Nicoló, P. Honohan, and A. Ize, “Dollarization of bank deposits: Causes and consequences,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1697–1727, 2005.

[31] E. Levy Yeyati, “Financial dollarization: Evaluating the consequences,” Economic Policy, vol. 21, no. 45, pp. 62–118, 2006.

[32] N. Sattorova, “Methods of ensuring liquidity of com-mercial banks in Uzbekistan,” International Multidisci-plinary Journal for Research & Development, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 55–58, 2025.

[33] Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Informa-tion on the main indicators of the banking sector as of December 1, 2025,” Tashkent, Dec. 23, 2025.

[34] Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Regula-tion on the requirements for liquidity management of commercial banks,” registered by the Ministry of Justice under No. 2709, Tashkent (as amended), Aug. 13, 2015.

[35] International Monetary Fund, “Republic of Uzbekistan: 2025 Article IV Consultation—Press Release and Staff Report,” IMF Country Report No. 25/143, Washington, DC, Jun. 24, 2025.

[36] Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “At the meeting on December 11, 2025, the Board decided to keep the policy rate unchanged at 14 percent per annum,” Tashkent, Dec. 11, 2025.

Cite This Article

Choose your preferred format

format_quote
Kholmatov, Azizjon . "Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan." American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. 14, no. 2, 2026, pp. 43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
Kholmatov, A. (2026). Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan. American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Volume 14(Issue 2), 43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
Kholmatov, Azizjon . "Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan." American Journal of Business and Operations Research Volume 14, no. Issue 2 (2026): 43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
Kholmatov, A. (2026) 'Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan', American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Volume 14(Issue 2), pp. 43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
Kholmatov A. Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan. American Journal of Business and Operations Research. 2026;Volume 14(Issue 2):43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
A. Kholmatov, "Strategic Priorities for Ensuring Commercial Bank Liquidity: A Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Approach to the Banking System of Uzbekistan," American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. Volume 14, no. Issue 2, pp. 43–51, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.140207
policy

Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

Digital Archive Ready