ASPG Menu
search

American Scientific Publishing Group

verified Journal

American Journal of Business and Operations Research

ISSN
Online: 2692-2967 Print: 2770-0216
Frequency

Continuous publication

Publication Model

Open access journal. All articles are freely available online with no APC.

American Journal of Business and Operations Research
Full Length Article

Volume 10Issue 1PP: 08-13 • 2023

Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM

Rehab Mohamed 1* ,
Mahmoud Ismail 1
1Department of Decision support, Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
* Corresponding Author.
Received: December 15, 2022 Revised: February 27, 2023 Accepted: March 23, 2023

Abstract

Several research on the topic of supply chain resilience and sustainability have been done in recent years. However, they make clear that there are various points of view when it comes to the sustainability-resilience relationship. To adapt supply chains (SC) to the needs of contemporary manufacturing processes, new trends and approaches in environmental protection and social welfare have been put into place. Even though sustainability and resilience have each been extensively examined separately, there aren't many concepts that combine them to determine supply chain performance. Therefore, this study is displaying the aspects of supply chain resilience and how it may affect sustainability triple bottom line. Moreover, this study presents an extension of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), α-Discounting multi-criteria decision-making (α-D MCDM) to evaluate the resilience aspects in more consistent manner. This study proposes an idea of utilization of α-D MCDM in different manner to solve several supply chain evaluation issues.  

Keywords

Supply chain resilience Supply chain sustainability &alpha -D MCDM

References

[1] Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics40(1), 56-65.

[2] El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics233, 107972.

[3] Li, G., Xue, J., Li, N., & Ivanov, D. (2022). Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review163, 102773.

[4] Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production16(15), 1699-1710.

[5] Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The international journal of logistics management20(1), 124-143.

[6] Vahidi, F., Torabi, S. A., & Ramezankhani, M. J. (2018). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Journal of Cleaner Production174, 1351-1365.

[7] Glas, A. H., Meyer, M. M., & Eßig, M. (2021). Covid-19 attacks the body of purchasing and supply management: a medical check of the immune system. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management27(4), 100716.

[8] Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply risk management: model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

[9] Jiang, W., Sha, E. H. M., Zhuge, Q., & Wu, L. (2017). Efficient assignment algorithms to minimize operation cost for supply chain networks in agile manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering108, 225-239.

[10] Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019). A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. International Journal of Production Research57(7), 1990-2008.

[11] Patil, A., Dwivedi, A., & Moktadir, M. A. (2023). Big data-Industry 4.0 readiness factors for sustainable supply chain management: Towards circularity. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109109.

[12] Cao, S., Johnson, H., & Tulloch, A. (2023). Exploring blockchain-based Traceability for Food Supply Chain Sustainability: Towards a Better Way of Sustainability Communication with Consumers. Procedia Computer Science217, 1437-1445.

[13] Li, Y., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2018). Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. Journal of cleaner production172, 2931-2941.

[14] Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production152, 242-258.

[15] Tariq, A., Badir, Y. F., Tariq, W., & Bhutta, U. S. (2017). Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technology in Society51, 8-23.

[16] Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management75, 54-72.

[17] Smarandache, F. (2010, July). α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision making (α-d MCDM). In 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

[18] Smarandache, F. (2013, May). Interval alpha-discounting method for MCDC. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the Institute of Solid Mechanics and Session of the Commission of Acoustics (The XXIVth SISOM), Bucharest (pp. 27-32).

[19] Smarandache, F. (2013, September). Three non-linear α-Discounting MCDM-method examples. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (pp. 174-176). IEEE.

Cite This Article

Choose your preferred format

format_quote
Mohamed, Rehab, Ismail, Mahmoud. "Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM." American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. Volume 10, no. Issue 1, 2023, pp. 08-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
Mohamed, R., Ismail, M. (2023). Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM. American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Volume 10(Issue 1), 08-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
Mohamed, Rehab, Ismail, Mahmoud. "Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM." American Journal of Business and Operations Research Volume 10, no. Issue 1 (2023): 08-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
Mohamed, R., Ismail, M. (2023) 'Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM', American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Volume 10(Issue 1), pp. 08-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
Mohamed R, Ismail M. Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM. American Journal of Business and Operations Research. 2023;Volume 10(Issue 1):08-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
R. Mohamed, M. Ismail, "Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM," American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. Volume 10, no. Issue 1, pp. 08-13, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201
Digital Archive Ready