Volume 18 • Issue 4 • PP: 301-312 • 2022
MCDM Problem using Generalized Dodecagonal Neutrosophic Number using Max – Min and Min – Max Principle
View PDF Abstract
Deciding is the most vital part in any situation or problem that we face in our real time atmosphere. It is the situation where we must decide on the available choices. We have introduced Dodecagonal Neutrosophic Number and its properties. The concept of max-min and min-max principle is applied to the problem that is taken. The concept of heavy ordered weighted averaging operator by assigning equal weights to the attributes and a solution is found for a MCDM problem.
Keywords
References
[1] F. Smarandache, “Neutrosophy and Neutrosophic Logic, First International Conference on
Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Logic Set, Probability & Statistics”, University of New Mexico, Gallup,
NM 87301, USA (2002).
[2] F. Smarandache, “Neutrosophic Set, a generalization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets”, International
Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 24, 287 – 297, (2005).
[3] H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd
edition, 1991.
[4] J. Q. Wang, Z. Zhang, “Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its
application to multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Journal of Systems Engineering and
Electronics, 20 (2009) 321-326.
[5] K. Selvakumari, S. Lavanya, “Solving Fuzzy Game Problem in Octagonal Neutrosophic
Numbers using Heavy OWA Operator”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7
(4.39), 497 – 499, 2018.
[6] R. R. Yager, “On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multi- Criteria Decision
Making”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18: 183-190.
[7] R. R. Yager, “Heavy OWA operators,” Fuzzy Optimization and decision making, vol.1, no.4, pp.379-
397,2002.
[8] T. Maeda, “On Characterization of equilibrium strategy of two-person zero sum games with fuzzy
payoffs”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 139(2), 2004, 283 – 296.
[9] V. Vijay, S. Chandra, C.R. Bector, “Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs”, Omega,33(5)
(2005), 425-429.
[10] Zadeh L. A. “Fuzzy Sets”. Information and control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
[11] Atanassov, K., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In V. Sgurev, ed., ITKRS Session, Sofia, June 1983,
Central Sci. and Techn. Library, Bulg. Academy of Sciences, 1984.
[12] Smarandache, F., Neutrosophy and Neutrosophic Logic, First International Conference on
Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Logic, Set, Probability, and Statistics University of New Mexico,
Gallup, NM 87301, USA,2002.
[13] Smarandache, F. A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic
Set, Neutrosophic Probability. American Research Press, Rehoboth, NM, 1999.
[14] Smarandache, F., Neutrosophic set a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inter. J. Pure
Appl. Math., 24, 287 – 297, 2005.
[15] Salama, A. A., Smarandache, F., & Kroumov, V., Neutrosophic crisp Sets & Neutrosophic crisp
Topological Spaces. Sets and Systems, 2(1), 25-30, 2014.
[16] Smarandache, F. & Pramanik, S. (Eds). (2016). New trends in neutrosophic theory and
applications. Brussels: Pons Editions.
[17] Salama, A. A., Smarandache, F., Neutrosophic Crisp Set Theory, Educational. Education
Publishing 1313 Chesapeake, Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212, (2015).
[18] Salama, A. A., & Smarandache, F. Neutrosophic crisp probability theory & decision-making
process, Critical Review: A Publication of Society for Mathematics of Uncertainty, vol. 12, p.
34-48, 2016.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format