Volume 25 • Issue 3 • PP: 511-539 • 2025
Entropy Measure on Selection of Cloud Computing using Bipolar Neutrosophic Environment Utilizing Topsis Method
View PDF Abstract
Multi-criteria decision-making is essential for resolving issues in the real world. The choice of cloud computing services on the basis of service quality is solved in this paper using bipolar-neutrosophic circumstances. The removal area approach is used to carry out the de-bipolarization technique. The results have been compared with other methods found in the research to determine which method provides better cloud service.
Keywords
References
[1] Atanassov, T. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set The Notions of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set ( IFS ) and Intuitionistic L-Fuzzy Sets ( ILFS ). 1986, pp. 87–96.
[2] S. Broumi , D. Nagarajan , A. Bakali , M. Talea , F. Smarandache , M.Lathamaheswari, J. Kavikumar ‘Implementation of Neutrosophic Function Memberships Using MATLAB Program’. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 27, 2019, pp. 44–52. [3] Chakraborty, A., Mondal, S. P., Ahmadian, A., Senu, N., Alam, S., & Salahshour, S. (2018). Different Forms of Triangular Neutrosophic Numbers, De-Neutrosophication Techniques, and their Applications. Symmetry, 10(8), 327. doi:10.3390/sym10080327
[4] Kumar Tiwari, Rohit, and Rakesh Kumar. ‘A Framework for Prioritizing Cloud Services in Neutrosophic Environment’. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, The Authors, 2022, pp. 3151–66, doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.05.009.
[5] Mondal, Himadri Shekhar & Hasan, Md. Tariq and Hossain, Md. Bellal and Mandal, Rajib. ‘Improving Reliable Cloud Computing Environment Using Fuzzy Logic’. INPROCEEDINGS, 2017, pp. 1–4, doi:10.1109/ICCITECHN.2017.8281825.
[6] Opricovic, Serafim, and Gwo Hshiung Tzeng. ‘Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS’. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, 2004, pp. 445–55, doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
[7] Smarandache,Florentin Smarandache A Unifying Field In Logics : Neutrosophic Logic . Neutrosophy , Neutrosophic Set , Neutrosophic Probability . Isbn 1-879585-76-6 American Research Press Rehoboth Florentin Smarandache A Unifying Field In Logics : Neutrosophic Logic .’ Romania, 2003.
[8] CloudHarmony. (n.d.). Retrieved December 19, 2022, from https://cloudharmony.com/Cloud Transparency Framework| Cloud Service Provider Comparisons. (n.d.). Retrieved December 19, 2022, from https://cloudspectator.com/cloud-service-provider-comparison
[9] Kumar, R. R., Gupta, A., & Singh, R. (2017). Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated MCDM methods under fuzzy environment. Journal of Supercomputing, 73(11), 4652–4682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2039-1
[10] Kumar Tiwari, Rohit, & Rakesh Kumar. ‘A Framework for Prioritizing Cloud Services in Neutrosophic Environment’. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, The Authors, 2022, pp. 3151–66, doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.05.009.
[11] Sidhu.Jagpreet, & Sarbjeet Singh. ‘Improved TOPSIS Method Based Trust Evaluation Framework for Determining Trustworthiness of Cloud Service Providers’. Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 15, no. 1, Journal of Grid Computing, 2017, pp. 81–105, doi:10.1007/s10723-016-9363-1.
[12] Huang, Yu-han, & Gui-wu Wei. VIKOR Method for Interval Neutrosophic Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making. 2017, pp. 1–10, doi:10.3390/info8040144.
[13] Biswas, P., Das, S., & Dutta, P. (2015). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Soft Computing, 19(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1891-2
[14] Garg, S. K., Versteeg, S., & Buyya, R. (2013). A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(4), 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.06.006
[15] Lu, X., Lu, X., Zhang, T., Fang, Y., & Ye, J. (2023). Neutrosophic Sets and Systems TOPSIS Method-Based Decision-Making Model of Simplified Neutrosophic Indeterminate Sets for Teaching Quality Evaluation TOPSIS Method-Based Decision-Making Model of Simplified Neutrosophic Indeterminate Sets for Teaching Qual. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 53.
[16] Kumar, R., & Kumar, S. (2023). A novel intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measure with applications in decision-making , pattern recognition , and clustering problems. Granular Computing, 1(1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00366-1
[17] Ajay, P. C. D., Broumi, S., Alphonse, T. A., & Ligori, T. A. A. (2022). An approach to decision-making via picture fuzzy soft graphs. Granular Computing, 7(3), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00282-2
[18] Swathy Akshaya, M., & Padmavathi, G. (2019). Taxonomy of Security Attacks and Risk Assessment of Cloud Computing. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 750). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1882-5_4
[19] Ali, A., Warren, D., & Mathiassen, L. (2017). International Journal of Information Management Cloud-based business services innovation : A risk management model. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.008
[20] Abdel-basset, M., Member, S., & Gamal, A. (2021). A Security-by-Design Decision-Making Model for Risk Management in Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Access, 9, 107657–107679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098675
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format