261 188
Full Length Article
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science
Volume 18 , Issue 4, PP: 334-343 , 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html |PDF


Construction of Sanda Teaching risk assessment index system using neutrosophic AHP method

Authors Names :   A. B. Bonilla Rodríguez   1 *     M. F. Cueva Moncayo   2     F. B. Morocho Quinchuela   3  

1  Affiliation :  Docente de la Carrera de Medicina de la Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes (UNIANDES)

    Email :  ua.anahibr80@uniandes.edu.ec

2  Affiliation :  Docente de la Carrera de Medicina de la Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes (UNIANDES)

    Email :  ua.mariafcueva@uniandes.edu.ec

3  Affiliation :  Docente de la Carrera de Medicina de la Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes (UNIANDES)

    Email :  ua.flormq29@uniandes.edu.ec

Doi   :   https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.180428

Received: March 28, 2022 Accepted: July 12, 2022

Abstract :

To build a strong country, build strong teaching. But teaching surrounding multiple risks. So this paper aims to identify and assess risks in teaching. The assessment risks in sanda teaching is a critical task and contain multiple conflict criteria. So we use Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). In this paper, we use an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to rank and compute each criterion's weights. We use five main and twenty sub-criteria. These criteria were evaluated under a neutrosophic environment—an example provided to present the outcomes of the proposed model. 

Keywords :

AHP; Sanda; Teaching risk; Assessment

References :

[1] S. D. Kolstø, ―Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk‐focused socio‐scientific

issue,‖ Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1689–1716, 2006.

[2] J. Hansen and M. Hammann, ―Risk in Science Instruction,‖ Sci. Educ., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 749–775,


[3] C. Christensen, ―Risk and school science education,‖ Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 205–223,


[4] D. Cerulli, J. Holbrook, and Ü. Mander, ―Devising an Instrument for Determining Students’

Preparedness for an Education through Science Learning Approach within the Topic of Natural

Hazards.,‖ Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 59–87, 2016.

[5] L. Simonneaux, N. Panissal, and E. Brossais, ―Students’ perception of risk about nanotechnology after

an SAQ teaching strategy,‖ Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 2376–2406, 2013.

[6] R. Levinson, P. Kent, D. Pratt, R. Kapadia, and C. Yogui, ―Developing a pedagogy of risk in

socio-scientific issues,‖ J. Biol. Educ., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 136–142, 2011.

[7] M. Majumder, ―Multi criteria decision making,‖ in Impact of urbanization on water shortage in face of

climatic aberrations, Springer, 2015, pp. 35–47.

[8] E. U. Choo, B. Schoner, and W. C. Wedley, ―Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision

making,‖ Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 527–541, 1999.

[9] S. D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, ―Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable

energy planning—A review,‖ Renew. Sustain. energy Rev., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 365–381, 2004.

[10] G. A. Kiker, T. S. Bridges, A. Varghese, T. P. Seager, and I. Linkov, ―Application of multicriteria

decision analysis in environmental decision making,‖ Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. An Int. J., vol. 1,

no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2005.

[11] M. Aruldoss, T. M. Lakshmi, and V. P. Venkatesan, ―A survey on multi criteria decision making

methods and its applications,‖ Am. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2013.

[12] L. Schenk et al., ―Teaching and discussing about risk: seven elements of potential significance for

science education,‖ Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1271–1286, 2019.

[13] M. M. W. B. Hendriks, J. H. de Boer, A. K. Smilde, and D. A. Doornbos, ―Multicriteria decision

making,‖ Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 175–191, 1992.

[14] C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar, and B. Oztaysi, ―Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review,‖

Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 637–666, 2015.

[15] H. R. Keller, D. L. Massart, and J. P. Brans, ―Multicriteria decision making: a case study,‖ Chemom.

Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 175–189, 1991.

[16] K. M. A.-S. Al-Harbi, ―Application of the AHP in project management,‖ Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 19,

no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2001.

[17] C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, and Z. Ulukan, ―Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP,‖ Logist.

Inf. Manag., 2003.

[18] A. A. Salama and S. A. Alblowi, ―Neutrosophic set and neutrosophic topological spaces,‖ IOSR J.

Math., vol. 3, no. 4, 2012.

[19] F. Smarandache, ―Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set,‖ Int. J. pure Appl.

Math., vol. 24, no. 3, p. 287, 2005.

[20] H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Zhang, and R. Sunderraman, Single valued neutrosophic sets. Infinite

study, 2010.

[21] M. Abdel-Basset, A. Gamal, N. Moustafa, A. Abdel-Monem, and N. El-Saber, ―A Security-by-Design

Decision-Making Model for Risk Management in Autonomous Vehicles,‖ IEEE Access, 2021.

Cite this Article as :
A. B. Bonilla Rodríguez , M. F. Cueva Moncayo , F. B. Morocho Quinchuela, Construction of Sanda Teaching risk assessment index system using neutrosophic AHP method, International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, Vol. 18 , No. 4 , (2022) : 334-343 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.180428)